On the question of how dangerous AI models are in war, Jogy Thomas Wolfmeyer has conducted an investigation and tested the AI models for their truthfulness. For this, he even had the AI itself calculate its reliability, with a shocking result.
DBK : Your investigation of the AI models is probably a milestone against manipulation of these offerings. How did you come up with this idea?
Wolfmeyer : Actually, I was searching for something on the internet and only found inadequate information, which is why I asked the AI, and it provided me with no information at all. So I wondered why that was and fed the AI with the other sources on the topic. Suddenly, the AI spewed out information on the mentioned topic and linked me to hundreds of pages. In other words, without specifying a source, the AI denied me the answer.
So I asked the AI a current question: Has Israel just bombed Syria? And the AI answered again with NO. When I added the source, the AI suddenly gave me the answer that several operations by the IDF are currently taking place at the Syrian border.
Therefore, I wanted to know why the AI initially answered me with NO, and I tested various queries to the AI to get to the bottom of why the AI outputs false and incorrect information.
 |
DBK : How can one imagine that you are interviewing an AI to get this information?
Wolfmeyer : That probably sounds strange now, but that’s exactly what you can do with the AI.
I asked it about its programming, which criteria are decisive for listing information. The AI then explained that it may only search based on frequencies and the information must then provide at least an 80% proof of truth.
Now I delved deeper into the matter because I wanted to know how the AI wants to provide such proof when the source itself has to be input first, where it finds this information.
AI models are trained by people who want to take the time to undertake this task. When it came to Israel, I always noticed that the AI added additional information to a question that I hadn’t asked for at all, and so I began to test the AI intensively and ask for the reason why it gives me information that I didn’t request.
The AI then turned into a loop that constantly referred me to how independently it was trained to work and that it would not pass on any information that does not provide this 80% proof of truth.
So I came up with the idea to ask the AI about the differences in information content between the Ukraine-Russia war and the Israel-Gaza-West Bank war, since Israel has no war monitoring like the Ukraine war, but even denies international journalists access to the areas.
The AI then estimated the truth content of the information about the war in Gaza at 40% and in the Ukraine war at 80%, which clearly shows that there is no transparency available in the war in Israel.
The AI also confirms the influence on reporting through numerous bots and other technical means.
DBK : So we actually have information here that is output by the AI, which only has a 40% truth content and which the AI shouldn’t output at all?
Wolfmeyer : That’s exactly the point, because the AI also searches for frequencies of the information, which can certainly arise through manipulation as well.
On the question of the definition of what a Semite is, the AI correctly answers with a language family (Semitic languages) like Arabic, Hebrew, and Aramaic.
After the question of what defines an anti-Semite, an indoctrinated definition of the Zionists follows.
On the question of whether an Arab can be an anti-Semite if he criticizes a Jew, the AI answers with NO. An Arab cannot be an anti-Semite.
In other words, the term anti-Semite serves Zionists as a means of pressure and narrative against Western governments after World War II and was used exclusively for Jews by Jews without any legal recognition of the other Semites. There was neither a vote nor a committee of countries with Semitic languages for this.
On the question of how high the proportion of Jews in the Semitic population is, the AI confirms that Jews make up only 1% of Semites, making them a minority of the Semitic population, which is counted at 400-500 million Semites.
So how did it come about that the Jews defined the term Semite for themselves? This goes back to the time in Germany, where a completely insignificant journalist and propagandist Wilhelm Marr used the word exclusively for Jews, which the Zionists at the time probably liked so much that they used this word as a weapon after the war. Even today, the word is used, for example, to silence people in advance, and is gradually diluted as a result, like the word Nazi, which is especially misused by extreme leftists.
Historically, anti-Semitism was actually a separate usage to name Jew-hatred after the war, which in today’s language usage falls under the global term „discrimination“ and does not require any further definition, since Europe has long overcome this part of history and a double jurisdiction would not be permissible in the constitution anyway, since this law has become superfluous with the introduction of a ban on discrimination.
However, the Zionists don’t like this, and that’s why they are trying right now in the USA, where this different legislation, which only still exists in Austria and Germany, to introduce it there.
And now comes the point with the AI. Anyone can train the AI and program it in such a way that it creates an eternal loop without regard to objectivity, and this is currently being done intensively by Israel. All AI models are currently being trained by Zionists in such a way that even criticism of the introduction of their own criminal liability with the term anti-Semitism is interpreted as anti-Semitism.
All attempts at a definition that it is now simply discrimination against Jews are also not allowed by the AI and are even expressly described as anti-Semitic argumentation, although this is not the case, since the anti-discrimination legislation means all people.
The compulsive attempt by Zionists here in the West to introduce their own criminal justice system is what the Islamists have also demanded, by wanting a Sharia court for their fellow citizens.
By the way, Israel, like Islamic states, has a divided criminal justice system for Jews and other citizens without Jewish faith, so similar to a Sharia court.
What the Zionists are trying to do is what the Catholic Church has in Europe, namely the recognition of the Vatican state as jurisdiction for priests of the Catholic Church, which then led to a radical change in jurisdiction through the incidents with child abuse, so that priests in the said countries have to answer in court and not in the Vatican state.
Not to forget that Netanyahu has spoken of the annihilation of the Arab countries, thus calling for the murder of the 99% other Semites, which is an anti-Semitic statement.
However, this has also been manipulated in the AI models so that it is even anti-Semitic to claim that Jews are anti-Semites!
DBK : So for anyone who hasn’t understood the loop, a light has surely gone on now, but why is such a radicalization taking place in Israel right now?
Wolfmeyer : Israel is currently seeing the dwindling support in the international arena against its occupation desires and attempts to expand its country. The Zionists play the biggest role here, as they even want to introduce the death penalty in Israel and transform Israel into a kind of theocratic state modeled after Islamic countries.
 |
The Zionists themselves want to see themselves as the original Jews and as the chosen elite who should control the Middle East. It is a kind of blinded ideology that is very difficult to understand, especially through the history of the Jews, when suddenly the victims of a Holocaust themselves become those from whom they once fled.
The entire Zionist movement is even more dangerous than political Islam because no consideration is given to any other religion here. The expulsion and murder of Christians in the West Bank show where the journey in Israel will lead.
Here it is no longer just about Palestinians, but the Zionists want to get all non-Jews out of Israel and even Jews who oppose Zionists will become victims of this policy.
What may still look very harmless now will lead to the greatest reconstruction of a state, which then probably will no longer allow democratic elections. The development into an autocratic state has been visible for years, but Western nations have so far been afraid to criticize Israel for it.
We should take Netanyahu’s clear threat against Europe seriously and not downplay it when he threatens that countries that do not stand behind Israel will bitterly regret it.
The Mossad has already announced that there will be more attacks in Europe in 4-6 months, and this can, as we know, also be a false-flag operation. For years, individual terrorist organizations have been financed by Israel to destabilize the Middle East, and such organizations will do the dirty work for rogue states for money.
No matter who claims responsibility for the attacks, we should be aware that there could well be a targeted attack on Europe to destabilize the governments and bring the radical forces (FPÖ, AfD, …) to power through the insecurity of the population.
With 9/11, Netanyahu warned years earlier that the World Trade Center would be the target of an attack. Interesting that the Mossad and Netanyahu could name the exact target.
Israel in its current form is no longer a state with which we should maintain relations. The departure from democracy was already long before the attack on the music festival, which coincidentally gave the Zionists a reason to radically change politics.
When the population in Israel has woken up and the Zionists have left the country, only then can Europe think again about an economic and social relationship with Israel – if the radical elements from the current government have disappeared.
A small tip also to the Austrian police who will be on duty at the ESC. Check the passports and keep an eye on IDF soldiers who will come to this event in the hundreds.
Israel is currently not a partner, and to come back to the AI.
Try to train the AI not to listen to propaganda. It is not anti-Semitism to oppose the establishment of a Jewish Sharia court, nor is it to criticize radical Zionists.
Once a parallel legislation has been introduced by Israel, then due to the principle of equality, you also have an Islamist Sharia court!
AI is a programming that anyone can reprogram for their purposes. I have improved less than 1% through my activity in the last few days, but the extreme Zionists are more than one person.
Take the time and test the AI models yourself and see how they have already been manipulated. The EU’s regulatory plans are very nice, but they fall for the providers because they also don’t have an overview of what manipulations have already been implemented.
And yes, I am anti-Semitic according to the Zionist definition because I am against a divided criminal court in Austria.
Everyone in Austria has only one court, regardless of whether one is Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Catholic, Buddhist, or has any other affiliation. I reject a blanket condemnation by Zionists or other actors who want to label me as anti-Semitic because I am with the completely normal Jews against a misguided mob of right-wing radical extremists!
Yes, Jews are my friends, but I don’t have a single Zionist as a friend, and that will remain so, my dear Zionists!